Google Ads Management

Google Ads Management That Starts With Finding the Leak.

Most underperforming accounts don't need a bigger budget. They need someone to open them up and find the tracking that never fired, the search terms burning spend, and the campaign type doing a job it was never built for. That's where I start — before touching a single bid. Once the foundation holds, scaling is the easy part.

£10.3M

Revenue scaled through Google Ads for a single UK apparel brand, at 4.69x ROAS

£4.5M

Sales generated from Google Shopping, £3.5M of it from new customers

$5M+

Total ad spend managed across ecommerce and lead generation accounts

Search Ads Performance Max Google Shopping Demand Gen YouTube Ads Remarketing

The Audit Comes First

Eight Things I Find in Almost Every Account I Take Over

When someone hands me an account that's underperforming, the problem is rarely the bidding. It's almost always something structural that nobody checked because checking it doesn't look like work.

So the first thing I do is a full audit — campaigns, conversion tracking, search terms, feeds, and the pages the ads point to. You get that audit written down before you've paid anything, and it tells you what's broken whether you hire me or not.

Conversion tracking that isn't firing

Duplicate conversions, actions counted twice, or a tag that broke during a site update months ago. Google optimises toward whatever you tell it — feed it bad data and it will confidently spend your budget in the wrong direction.

Fixed: tracking rebuilt and verified end to end

Search terms nobody has read

Broad match with no negative list quietly buys traffic you'd never choose to pay for — job seekers, competitors, people looking for free versions of what you sell. It compounds every single month.

Fixed: search term hygiene and negative structure

The wrong campaign type doing the job

Performance Max absorbing budget that belonged in Search. Shopping running without a properly structured feed. Remarketing set up as cold prospecting. The campaign type has to match the intent it's chasing.

Fixed: campaign architecture rebuilt around intent

Ad copy written once and never revisited

Headlines that describe the company instead of the offer, assets Google is quietly downgrading, and no testing running at all. Copy is one of the few levers that moves both cost per click and conversion rate.

Fixed: new copy, assets and ongoing testing

Budget spread evenly across uneven performers

A handful of campaigns produce nearly all the revenue while the rest slowly drain the account. Without clean attribution nobody can tell which is which, so the split never changes.

Fixed: budget reallocated to what actually converts

Landing pages that can't convert the traffic

The ads work, the clicks arrive, and the page they land on was built for a different purpose entirely. This is the leak agencies ignore most often, because fixing it sits outside "ads."

Fixed: landing pages built and optimised in scope

Bidding strategy left on the wrong setting

Target ROAS set before there was enough conversion data to support it. Maximise Clicks running long after it should have been switched. Smart bidding is genuinely good now — but only when it's pointed at accurate data and a realistic target.

Fixed: bidding matched to data volume and real targets

Campaign settings nobody checked

Search Partners and Display Expansion left on by default. Location targeting set to "presence or interest" instead of presence. The wrong conversion action feeding the campaign. These take minutes to fix and quietly distort everything downstream.

Fixed: every setting audited line by line

Campaign Types

What I Manage — and When Each One Is the Wrong Choice

Most wasted spend comes from running the right campaign type for the wrong stage of intent. Here's how I decide.

Google Search Ads

The highest-intent traffic on the platform — people typing exactly what they want, right now. Search is where most accounts should be profitable first, before anything else gets budget.

Best for
Existing demand, lead gen, high-consideration purchases
Wrong when
Nobody is searching for what you sell yet

Google Shopping

Product listings driven almost entirely by your Merchant Center feed. Get the feed right — titles, attributes, images, structure — and Shopping does most of the work. Get it wrong and no amount of bidding rescues it.

Best for
Ecommerce with a clean, well-structured product catalogue
Wrong when
Feed data is thin, or margins can't absorb the CPCs

Performance Max

One campaign across Search, Shopping, YouTube, Display, Discover and Gmail. Powerful with good data and strong assets — and a very efficient way to burn budget without them. It needs guardrails, not blind trust.

Best for
Accounts with clean conversion data and enough volume to learn
Wrong when
Tracking is broken, or it's cannibalising Search and Shopping

Demand Gen

Visual, audience-led campaigns across YouTube, Discover and Gmail. This is for creating demand rather than capturing it — useful once Search is profitable and you need a bigger pool of people who know you exist.

Best for
Brands with strong creative and a defined audience
Wrong when
You're judging it on last-click ROAS in week one

YouTube Ads

The cheapest attention on the internet, and the easiest to waste. Success here is decided by the first five seconds of the creative and by who you exclude — not by how much you're willing to bid.

Best for
Products that need explaining, and top-of-funnel reach
Wrong when
You have no video creative worth putting budget behind

Remarketing

Bringing back people who already showed intent — viewed a product, started a checkout, filled half a form. Almost always the cheapest conversions in an account, and almost always under-built.

Best for
Recovering abandoned carts and unfinished enquiries
Wrong when
Audience lists are too small, or used as cold prospecting